Attached to real life background, Nolan's dark universe was always believable. But is that enough to consider it better than any other super-hero based-on movie?- Certainly all casts are always thought to be perfect. In this modern bat-trilogy, more than very efficient, the cast is part of the movie-magic. Com. Gordon was based, as the plot in general, on the young and tough policeman of Miller's "Batman: Year One". Different from the aged chief shown in Tim Burton's movies, Gary Oldman here gets engaged to the action raising the importance of his role as the story moves. Alfred's case is no different, Michael Cane is a serious butler and, more than this, like Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman) he's a steward for Bruce Wayne. Speaking of Bruce, by the way, Christian Bale is the right guy: at the same time he plays Bruce like a spoiled and confused teenage in the beginning and as a vengeance-full determined man in the end of the first movie. Miller's graphic novel, most of all. The second movie just make things better: it's darker, heavier, deeper. Characters follow the wave, becoming more and more unstable as the film reaches the end. It's all, like every bat-fan knows, part of the plan. Follow [CoMoOm Anagram] to appreciate the movies-comics interactions of the films so far. Rachel Dawes case is complicated. Katie Holmes was as bad as a regular female role could be when played as a walk in the park. The thing is, you can be Al Pacino walking in the park or you can be Katie Holmes. Her character was obviously a minor peace of the whole, but she could just pretend something there was important. Like what Maggie Gyllenhaal did in TDK. Again it's not the most crucial role of the movie, but the actress gets connected to the audience and, above all, to Harvey Dent, determining the plot twist that was clearly vital to the saga.
For a while, keep in touch with the [CoMoOm Anagram]
No comments:
Post a Comment